Competing interests may take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one): All authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests. When submitting a final manuscript for publication, all figures must be uploaded as separate figure files ensuring that the image quality and formatting conforms to the specifications below. [CDATA[> Smith, J. Syntax of referencing in How to reference books (ed. The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. 0, , The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. SCIWaiting to Send Decision to Author, @12:21ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @5:, , @13:ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @16:, Geotechnical Engineeng With Assessor, SCIreviewNot Assigned, SCIreviewers assigend, , Eupean Polymer Journal with editor, sciunder review reviews invited, worduse 2007 or later version, mateals letters 3Required Reviews Completed. The Editors then make a decision based on the Reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities: (a) Accept, with or without editorial revisions (b) Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached (c) Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a resubmission (d) Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems. Manuscripts should be submitted via the online submission system: Submit manuscript. Onc.) If you have figures or tables prepared, include them with your appeal letter. J. The journals operate under a collaborative editorial model, with active researchers engaged as manuscript-handling Editors, supported by in-house, PhD-trained Nature Portfolio managing Editors. Please use initials to refer to each author's contribution in this section, for example: "FC analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the hematological disease and the transplant. I think it seems a long time for this step. For information about referencing human single-nucleotide variants, see this editorial from Nature Genetics. How do I check the status of my manuscript? Thank you for visiting nature.com. Serum Response . criteria that authors should consider before submitting papers to npj Digital Medicine. Here, we have developed a screening system that enables us to determine the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by . However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. If the authors ask the Editors to consider the previous reviews, they should include a note explaining the relationship between the submitted manuscript and the previous submission and (assuming it has been revised in light of the referees' criticisms) give a point-by-point response to the referees. npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer then you had anticipated. (()--2020-0033) Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be held to rigorous standards with respect to experimental methods and characterization of compounds. Correspondence and all forms of published correction may also be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the Editors. 0, 49 Grant details and acknowledgments are not permitted as numbered references. Authors are encouraged to consider the needs of colourblind readers (a substantial minority of the male population) when choosing colours for figures. See How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Small sample size: When the sample size is small (less than about 10), authors should use tests appropriate to small samples or justify their use of large-sample tests. | Use the same typeface (Arial or Helvetica) for all figures. The Methods section should be subdivided by short bold headings referring to methods used and we encourage the inclusion of specific subsections for statistics, reagents and animal models. or a standard deviation (s.d.). SCI"Waiting to Send Decision to Author". If you want to find out more about when to expect a decision from the Editor, click here. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any figures or illustrations that are protected by copyright, including figures published elsewhere and pictures taken by professional photographers. Volume numbers and the subsequent comma appear in bold. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Manuscripts submitted to the npj Series journals do not need to adhere to our formatting requirements at the point of initial submission; formatting requirements only apply at the time of acceptance. If the decision is not to send the manuscript for review, the Editor contacts the author with the decision. (()--2020-0033) The peer review of any submissions for which the Editor has a competing interest is handled by another Editor who has no competing interests, to ensure that the evaluation of these submissions is completely objective. In either case, the revised manuscript should be accompanied by a cover letter explaining how the manuscript has been changed, and a separate point-by-point response to referees' comments. The npj Series journals are committed to publishing the highest-quality research. 28 Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. It is also appropriate to include suggested or excluded referees in the cover letter. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. Should your manuscript be accepted, you will receive more extensive instructions for final submission of display items. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? All Rights Reserved. If using a bar chart, please note that either individual data points must be overlaid on the bars or the chart must be converted to a dot-plot or box-and-whisker-plot format. The decision is sent to the author. The thinnest lines in the final figure should be no smaller than one point wide. Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review, typically to two or three Reviewers. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories). Robert Eagling161167100-150Cell PressChem Nature Chemistry Guy15Chem , 1, 4NRTNRTNRT, NRTNHCNRTNHCNRT10000NHCCorrections163ACS National Meeting, ACSGuyGuyNature Chemistry Chem GuyChem GuypptsubmittedacceptedNature Chemistry Guy, 10emailC&EN Stable phosphorus carbene analog debutsRory WatermanPreviewA Bottle-able Phosphinidene, a new chapter in phosphorus chemistry beginsFigure 3, DavidUCSDMaxGuyHansmann, M. M.; Jazzar, R.; Bertrand, G., Singlet (Phosphino)phosphinidenes are Electrophilic. To post social content, you must have a display name. Editorial decision making and the peer review process. [CDATA[// >